The ‘Gänseliesel’ (Goose Girlis), a historical fountain erected in 1901, represents the most well-known landmark of the city of Goettingen.

Unpacking Economic and Social Rights: International and Comparative Dimensions - Conference

The Goettingen Journal of International Law is pleased to announce that we will take part in a conference in November 2018. The joint research project of the Institute of International and European Law of the University of Göttingen and the Minerva Center for Human Rights at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law will be holding this conference in Göttingen, Germany under the title “Unpacking Economic and Social Rights: International and Comparative Dimensions”. The conference is a culmination of a joint research project directed by Prof. Tomer Broude and Prof. Andreas L. Paulus and examines economic and social rights from a comparative perspective, looking at German, Israeli and European legal systems and their respective constitutional, legislative and jurisprudential experiences, as well as the universal human rights framework under the auspices of the United Nations. In addition to this call, Prof. Paulus and Prof. Broude, junior researchers of the project and associate and invited scholars will present their research at the conference.

Scholars who work on economic and social rights are invited to submit abstracts. The proceedings of the conference and papers presented will be published in one of our upcoming issues. See the call for papers and the conference website for more details.

Deadline for submission of Abstracts: 1 June 2018. Accepted proposals will be notified by 1 July 2018. Full papers due for submission by 1 November 2018.

For queries and clarifications – please contact


The Least-Developed Countries Services Waiver: Any Alternative Under the GATS?

Claudia Manrique Carpio & Jaume Comas Mir



Despite the fact that least-developed countries (LDCs) constitute approximately 12 percent of the world’s population, they account for 0.5 percent of the world’s trade in commercial services.[1] LDCs have important disadvantages that prevent them from acquiring an adequate share of benefits from liberalization of trade in services. In this context, the suitability of the special and differential treatment provisions of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) for the LDCs’ needs and of the flexibility of GATS architecture has been questioned. Article IV:3 of the GATS gives a mandate to negotiate mechanisms that could increase the participation of LDCs in the multilateral trade system. After more than ten years of negotiations, finally in December 2011, the Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO) approved a services waiver decision that allows developed and developing countries to depart from the most favored nation principle in order to grant preferential treatment for LDCs’ services and service suppliers. Therefore, this article first examines the legal scope of the LDCs services waiver, including the background of the waiver, the preferences covered, and the main conditions applying to these preferences. Then, the viability of the waiver’s implementation as a useful tool to boost LDCs’ participation in trade in services and engagement within the GATS is analyzed. The authors also examine whether the waiver has failed to fulfill its mains objectives, whether other alternatives exist. In this contribution the authors argue that the waiver might not have a strong incidence, because of the following regulatory concerns: Firstly, neither a binding obligation is imposed on developed and developing countries to grant preferential treatment in market access, nor any right to perceive preferential treatment is assured to LDCs. As the services waiver is primarily focused on voluntary market access preferences, LDCs’ services suppliers may not find enough legal certainty regarding a preferential treatment, as it might be withdrawn at any time. Secondly, the discipline which allows other discriminatory measures in favor of LDCs is even weaker as it needs approval by the Council on Trade in Services. It therefore should be reinforced and clarified. Thirdly, the difficulty of interpreting ‘rules of origin’ and the consequences of its ambiguous definition need to be overcome. Finally, it is also relevant to consider the differences between the preferential treatment process of concessions to LDCs and the general multilateral negotiation process for trade in services in the WTO that should be considered by members to grant preferences. Nevertheless, alternatives to enhance LDCs’ integration within the GATS could exist, although lack of political willingness may affect the outcome. Two options have been identified. Firstly, market access negotiations in modes of supply of export interest to LDCs should be linked with those attractive to non- LDCs. Secondly, good regulation and regulatory cooperation are essential to overcome non-market access barriers, while disciplines on domestic regulation and extension of mutual recognition agreements to LDCs should be reinforced, essentially building solid institutional mechanisms. Consequently, the ‘aid for trade’ shall be driven to implement LDCs’ domestic regulatory reforms.


[1] See, with reference to 2011, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), The Least Developed Countries Report 2013: Growth With Employment for Inclusive and Sustainable Development (2013), 28; WTO, Market Access for Products and Services of Export Interest to Least-Developed Countries: Note by the Secretariat, WTO Doc WT/COMTD/LDC/W/56/Rev.1, 31 October 2012, 23 & 40, paras 58 & 86. In 2012, the share of LDCs in world exports of commercial services increased insignificantly to 0.6 percent. See WTO, Market Access for Products and Services of Export Interest to Least- Developed Countries: Note by the Secretariat, WTO Doc WT/COMTD/LDC/W/58, 10 September 2013, 22, para. 2.48.



Download the full text as a PDF