The ‘Gänseliesel’ (Goose Girlis), a historical fountain erected in 1901, represents the most well-known landmark of the city of Goettingen.

Unpacking Economic and Social Rights: International and Comparative Dimensions - Conference

The Goettingen Journal of International Law is pleased to announce that we will take part in a conference in November 2018. The joint research project of the Institute of International and European Law of the University of Göttingen and the Minerva Center for Human Rights at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law will be holding this conference in Göttingen, Germany under the title “Unpacking Economic and Social Rights: International and Comparative Dimensions”. The conference is a culmination of a joint research project directed by Prof. Tomer Broude and Prof. Andreas L. Paulus and examines economic and social rights from a comparative perspective, looking at German, Israeli and European legal systems and their respective constitutional, legislative and jurisprudential experiences, as well as the universal human rights framework under the auspices of the United Nations. In addition to this call, Prof. Paulus and Prof. Broude, junior researchers of the project and associate and invited scholars will present their research at the conference.

Scholars who work on economic and social rights are invited to submit abstracts. The proceedings of the conference and papers presented will be published in one of our upcoming issues. See the call for papers and the conference website for more details.

Deadline for submission of Abstracts: 1 June 2018. Accepted proposals will be notified by 1 July 2018. Full papers due for submission by 1 November 2018.

For queries and clarifications – please contact

Effective Law-Making in Times of Global Crisis – A Role for International Organizations

Stefan Kirchner



Public International Law is often slow to react to changes and challenges. Due to the need for consensus among the subjects to which rules are meant to apply, the creation of new rules often requires more time than is available in times of crisis. At the same time, Public International Law is highly flexible and might provide alternative means for the effective and fast creation of new rules. In this article I will examine several alternatives to traditional treaty-based law-making with regard to their effective creation and operation. Alternatives could include soft law which, although relatively fast to create, is non-binding, raising doubts as to its effectiveness for regulation in times of crisis. In the last few years, network approaches to law-making have been discussed, most recently with regard to the Group of Twenty (G20). While this approach might look modern, it raises serious questions as to the legitimacy of rules created hereunder. A more legitimate form of law-making could be through international organizations. This leaves two options: the mere drafting of rules by international organizations, and actual legislation by them. It is the latter option which appears to be most efficient. In this text, the work of several international organizations is investigated more closely, ranging from the loose G 20 to international organizations which rely on non-binding recommendations to international organizations which have an actual law-making capacity. At the center of the investigation is the question of how existing international organizations can effectively create new rules which enable states parties to react swiftly, while at the same time taking into account the technical expertise required to formulate an effective response to a global crisis. In this context, the experience of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) can serve as models for other international organizations. The ICAO's reaction to the threat of terrorism provides an interesting example for effective law-making in times of crisis. After a short introduction to the law-making capabilities of the ICAO, I will examine how effective it really is and whether the ICAO can serve as a model for future reactions to crises by rapidly providing new rules for a large number of member states in a field which can be technically complicated – characteristics which apply to the global financial crisis as well as global epidemics, climate change and similar issues.


Download the full text as a PDF